Us Health Care Costs

If you’ve read much of my blog you will know that I am from England where health care is free at the point of delivery, it is not free, people pay a tax so that when they really need health care they don’t have to decide whether or not to see a doctor and lose their house in fees or to accept that they will die earlier than they would if they could afford medical care. You will also know that when I got diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma I was completely baffled by the US health insurance system with people talking about co-pays, deductibles, in-scheme and all sorts of other words and phrases I’d just never come across. Without my wife doing everything¬†for me I couldn’t have navigated my way through the maze because, along the way I discovered that there were several billing mistakes which had to be rectified, and, wouldn’t you just know it, none of them were in our favor.

This week I got another shock from the industry known as U.S. medicine and health care. I saw my surgeon for a pre-op meeting so that he could ask how long I’d had my port in my body, prod it a couple of times, speak to the two trainee doctors who trailed around after him and then shake my hand. At the maximum he spent 8 minutes with me; his receptionist somewhat less and I’d already seen the guy who arranged the surgical appointment. I’d payed my co-pay when I was in his office and then, this week, I received an invoice for $485.00, the remainder of his fee after deduction of my $50.00 co-pay. The letter did threaten that “If this matter is not resolved in a timely manner, serious collection activity may be initiated:. Naturally I spoke to my insurance company but I ended up passing the phone to my wife as I couldn’t make head nor tale of what the insurance company wanted to know let alone what it had done simply because none of the figures they were giving matched with the ones I knew of. It turned out that the reason none of the figures matched was because the deal between my insurance company and my surgeon means that instead of receiving $485.00 from me he actually received just $90.00 from my insurer, that’s right, a reduction of $395.00!!! I find that amazing. Either he’s now working for next to nothing or his office has bloated the fee to a standard which is acceptable here in the U.S. To some extent it doesn’t affect me as I have insurance, but, if I didn’t have that insurance, I’d now owe nearly $500.00 when the physician group would have settled for less than $100.00. It seems reasonably obvious that one of the two main groups which don’t have medical insurance are the poor and unemployed and yet it would seem that they are likely to get hit with a bill almost 500% larger than the bill paid by an insurer. Yes, the U.S. clearly wants to take care of the poor and impoverished who have turned up on its shores.

I read and hear a lot about Obama care, and while I think it is better than nothing, it doesn’t go far enough. The U.S. needs to stop worrying about socialism in medicine, about government interference in making people take out medical insurance, it should, in my opinion, and I realize that I am only a guest here, move towards a system such as that in the UK, where people are taxed to pay for health care, surely the government can’t object to taxing its citizens can it?


1 Comment

Filed under Cancer, Health Insurance

One response to “Us Health Care Costs

  1. Joanne Kaufman

    Ah, if only it was that simple….but it isn’t, for a number of interrelated reasons. The government does not want to further tax its people because the American value system is predicated on a misdirected sense of self-determinism and independence — people believe, erroneously, that choice is being taken away from them and they are being forced to accept a “socialistic” system if we adopted a single-payer system like the UK has. Capitalizing on that fear is the one percent’s thrust to privatize everything, as reflected in the educational system and vouchers for private schools, etc. Big Pharma, the Medical-Industrial Complex, and related industries have deep pockets and extensive lobbying connections, and so many of our politicians, who collectively we refer to as government, move in and out of private enterprise and public service, maintaining their connections, so the lines get blurred. Finally, the people are kept distracted and entertained by sensationalism in the media and graphic TV, and would rather remain oblivious than feel the full impact of their powerlessness and disengagement. How many decades has it taken the inequality gap to rise to the public consciousness? The system is so deeply entrenched that I’m surprised Obama was able to get as far as he did, even though Obamacare is woefully inadequate, as you say. And now that the Supreme Court has removed virtually all restrictions on campaign financing, under the guise of not treading on free speech, I believe we can further kiss the possibility of a government that is not determined by greed and avarice goodbye. Change is coming slowly and unevenly, with one, rarely two, steps forward and one back.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s